Cases 31 - 40 of 872
McElroy v. Doe
as 4:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
Jerel McElroy
Defendant:
Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
CLAUDIO v. PENSCHICHEN et al
as 5:2024cv00572
Petitioner:
ROBERT CLAUDIO
Respondent:
DAVID PENSCHICHEN, MS. JANE DOE and GEORGE NASSIF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Noble v. Warden John/Jane Doe
as 1:2024cv00633
Petitioner:
Jerome Noble
Respondent:
Warden John/Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Watkins v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Lynn Watkins
Defendant:
Doe and Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Garrett
as 2:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
Shane Michael Brown
Defendant:
Doe and C Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Conlin v. United States of America et al
as 7:2024cv00017
Petitioner:
Jeremy Lee Conlin, John Doe and Texas Doe
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and United States Marshals
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Johnson v. Core Civic, Inc. et al
as 6:2024cv00021
Petitioner:
Kurk Johnson
Respondent:
Core Civic, Inc., Mark Knutson, Trabel Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Noble v. Warden John/Jane Doe
as 1:2023cv11062
Petitioner:
Jerome Noble
Respondent:
Warden John/Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Murphy v. State of Mississippi
as 1:2023cv00363
Plaintiff:
Matthew Thomas Murphy
Defendant:
John Doe and State of Mississippi
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott v. Doe
as 3:2023cv03150
Plaintiff:
Qu'Maurryion Scott
Defendant:
John Doe
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
