Cases 31 - 40 of 770
Gayton v. Rivers
as 3:2023cv01842
Petitioner:
Timothy Gayton
Respondent:
C Rivers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Justin Johnson v. Warden, Broad River Correctional Institution
as 23-6753
Petitioner / Appellant:
JUSTIN JERMAINE JOHNSON, a/k/a Justin J. Johnson
Respondent:
WARDEN, BROAD RIVER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
McLean v. Rivers
as 3:2023cv01750
Petitioner:
Lenroy McLean
Respondent:
C Rivers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Rivers v. Janica
as 6:2023cv00033
Petitioner:
Dennis Lee Rivers
Respondent:
Sheriff Kelly Janica
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Phillips v. Broad River Correctional Institution
as 1:2023cv03203
Petitioner:
Joshua Lee Phillips
Respondent:
South Carolina Department of Corrections and Warden of Broad River Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Randall Chirrick v. Brad Cain
as 23-35448
Petitioner / Appellant:
RANDALL S. CHIRRICK
Respondent / Appellee:
BRAD CAIN, Superintendent Snake River Correctional Inst.
Malachowski v. Rivers
as 23-10614
Petitioner / Appellant:
Marcel Malachowski
Respondent / Appellee:
NFN Rivers, Warden
Dale Brooks v. Jamie Miller, et al
as 23-35391
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAMIEN EUGENE BROOKS and DALE EUGENE BROOKS
Respondent / Appellee:
JAMIE MILLER, Superintendent, Snake River Correctional Institution
Respondent:
STATE OF OREGON
Lloyd Hammond v. James Green
as 23-5502
Petitioner / Appellant:
LLOYD HAMMOND
Respondent / Appellee:
TIM LANE, Warden, Green River Correctional Complex and JAMES DAVID GREEN, Warden, Eastern Kentucky Correctional Complex
Ernie Perez v. Brad Cain
as 23-35373
Petitioner / Appellant:
ERNIE JUNIOR PEREZ
Respondent / Appellee:
BRAD CAIN, Superintendent of Snake River Correctioanl Institution
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
