Cases 31 - 40 of 465
Ames v. Wells
as 2:2022cv01548
Petitioner:
Dvonta Ames
Respondent:
Jason Wells
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wells v. Cain
as 3:2022cv00741
Plaintiff:
William B. Wells
Defendant:
Burl Cain
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wells v. Brown
as 5:2022cv00307
Petitioner:
Andrivia Frances Wells
Respondent:
Ray S. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Horsey v. Ranks
as 5:2022cv01021
Petitioner:
James Wells Horsey
Respondent:
William Ranks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Peters-Jung v. Freddys Steak Burger et al
as 7:2022cv00118
Petitioner:
Marc Aaron Peters-Jung
Respondent:
Freddys Steak Burger, Arby's, Popeyes Chicken and others
Plaintiff:
Magic Johnson
Defendant:
Stephanie Crowell, Meagan O'Neal, Day Time Crew Members (2020) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Whipp v. Wells
as 2:2022cv01350
Petitioner:
Michael J Whipp
Respondent:
Mr J Wells
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lawrence v. Wells
as 2:2022cv01226
Petitioner:
Aaron S Lawrence
Respondent:
Jason Wells
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wells v. Spaulding
as 3:2022cv01551
Petitioner:
Perry J. Wells
Respondent:
Stephen Spaulding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wells v. Lumpkin
as 4:2022cv03005
Petitioner:
Robert Wells, Jr.
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wells v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2022cv00350
Petitioner:
Robert Wells, Jr.
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
