Cases 31 - 40 of 54
Johnson v. Stephens
as 5:2014cv01039
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Mark William Johnson
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson #235820 v. Woods
as 2:2014cv00221
Petitioner:
William Johnson #235820
Respondent:
Jeffrey Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
William Johnson v. Marirosa Lamas, et al
as 14-3208
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
MARIROSA LAMAS, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Turner El v. Brown et al
as 2:2014cv01455
Petitioner:
Eugene Turner El
Respondent:
Jerry Brown, Anne Gust, Anthony Silva and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2014cv00215
Plaintiff:
Rick William Johnson
Defendant:
William Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2014cv01185
Petitioner:
Rick William Johnson
Respondent:
William Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2014cv00372
Petitioner:
William Johnson
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2014cv00243
Petitioner:
William Johnson
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Martin et al
as 1:2012cv07740
Petitioner:
William Johnson
Respondent:
Allen Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JOHNSON v. LAMAS et al
as 2:2012cv05156
Petitioner:
WILLIAM JOHNSON
Respondent:
MARIROSA LAMAS, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
