Cases 41 - 50 of 15,621
Timm v. State of Wisconsin
as 2:2024cv00558
Petitioner:
John E Timm
Respondent:
State of Wisconsin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kengne v. Fulton County Jail et al
as 1:2024cv01991
Petitioner:
Raissa Djuissi Kengne
Respondent:
Fulton County Jail, Sheriff Patrick Labat, The State of Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones #162751 v. Berghuis
as 1:2024cv00473
Petitioner:
John W. Jones #162751
Respondent:
Mary Berghuis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Yung v. Adams et al
as 1:2024cv03304
Petitioner:
John Yung
Respondent:
N.Y.C Mayor Adams, Warden and Commissioner of NYC Dept of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stead v. Morrison
as 2:2024cv11183
Petitioner:
Michael Stead
Respondent:
Warden John Christiansen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Johnson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Pinellas County)
as 8:2024cv01059
Petitioner:
John Fitzgerald Johnson
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Yung v. NYC Mayor Adams et al
as 1:2024cv03272
Plaintiff:
John Yung
Defendant:
NYC Mayor Adams, Warden of OBCC Rikers Island of NYC and Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McCrory v. Hamm (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00247
Plaintiff:
Charles McCrory
Defendant:
John Hamm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wakefield v. People of the State of New York
as 6:2024cv06243
Petitioner:
John W. Wakefield
Respondent:
People of the State of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
