Cases 41 - 50 of 534
Clark v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 5:2022cv00133
Plaintiff:
Clifford Clark
Defendant:
Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clark v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 5:2022cv00134
Plaintiff:
Clifford Clark
Defendant:
Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clark v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 2:2022cv00206
Petitioner:
Clifford Clark
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clark v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 2:2022cv00207
Petitioner:
Clifford Clark
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clark v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 2:2022cv00208
Petitioner:
Clifford Clark
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clark v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 2:2022cv00205
Petitioner:
Clifford Clark
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bowen v. Warden Noble Correctional Institution
as 2:2022cv03725
Petitioner:
Clifford J Bowen
Respondent:
Warden Noble Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Caudle v. State of Oklahoma, The
as 4:2022cv00453
Petitioner:
Zachary Caudle
Respondent:
Tanya Wilson, Clifford Smith and State of Oklahoma, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Newman v. Payne et al
as 2:2022cv00188
Plaintiff:
Clifford Arthur Newman
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Solomon Graves and Tommy Hurst
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gooden v. Lane et al
as 0:2022cv02543
Petitioner:
Clifford A. Gooden, III
Respondent:
Tim Lane, Meghan Corbin and Elizabeth O'Donnell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
