Cases 41 - 50 of 957
Glenn v. Nelson
as 6:2023cv00674
Petitioner:
Demetrius Glenn, Glenn and Demetriss Glenn
Respondent:
Warden Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Glenn Bruton v. Warden, et al
as 23-10498
Petitioner / Appellant:
GLENN BRUTON
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF GEORGIA
GLENN v. KALLIS
as 2:2023cv00053
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER GLENN
Respondent:
S. KALLIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
GLENN v. ADAMS
as 1:2023cv00015
Petitioner:
NORMAN O GLENN
Respondent:
WARDEN ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James v. Graziano
as 1:2023cv00273
Petitioner:
Anthony Glenn James
Respondent:
Kristin Graziano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
Fawley v. Youngkin et al
as 2:2023cv00023
Petitioner:
Benjamin W. Fawley
Respondent:
Glenn Youngkin and Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Turnbo v. Hudson
as 5:2022cv03311
Petitioner:
Richard Glenn Turnbo
Respondent:
D. Hudson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Glenn v. Warden, FCC Coleman Low
as 5:2022cv00659
Petitioner:
Eldred Glenn
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hoover v. State of South Carolina
as 0:2022cv04498
Petitioner:
Mr. Billy G. Hoover
Respondent:
State of South Carolina and Director, Alvin S. Glenn Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Drayton v. Director, Alvin S. Glenn Detention Center
as 0:2022cv04442
Petitioner:
Marcus T. Drayton and Marcus Drayton
Respondent:
State of South Carolina and Director, Alvin S. Glenn Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
