Cases 41 - 50 of 1,388
Randall v. Renzi et al
as 9:2022cv01381
Petitioner:
Jarrod Carl Randall
Respondent:
Hon. Judge Eugene Renzi, Kristopher Sterns, Kim Wood and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Martinez v. Watson
as 3:2022cv02227
Petitioner:
Michael Martinez and Nicholas Martinez
Respondent:
Warden Tom Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WILLIAMS v. JOHNSON et al
as 2:2022cv01639
Petitioner:
RAYMOND WILLIAMS
Respondent:
THEODORE JOHNSON, GOVERNOR TOM WOLF and PENNSYLVANIA PAROLE BOARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brundage v. Watson
as 5:2022cv02086
Petitioner:
Scott Brundage
Respondent:
Warden Tom Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mejia v. Watson
as 2:2022cv03257
Petitioner:
Sidney Mejia
Respondent:
Tom Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Emasealu v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv01047
Petitioner:
Tom Ineze Emasealu
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Fletcher v. Jones
as 2:2022cv00187
Petitioner:
Olajide Adel Fletcher
Respondent:
Tom Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ahreshien v. Watson
as 3:2022cv01303
Petitioner:
Hussam A. Ahreshien
Respondent:
Warden Tom Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martinez v. Warden, North Central Correctional Complex
as 2:2022cv02890
Petitioner:
Marvin Martinez
Respondent:
Warden Tom Watson and Warden, North Central Corectional Complex
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mejia v. Watson
as 3:2022cv01241
Petitioner:
Sidney Mejia
Respondent:
Warden Tom Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
