Cases 41 - 50 of 523
Ramsey v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 4:2018cv01101
Petitioner:
James E. Ramsey
Respondent:
United States Department of Justice, United States Parole Commission and United States Marshals
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
RIMKA v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
as 1:2018cv01557
Defendant:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Plaintiff:
EDWARD RIMKA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
WATSON v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
as 3:2018cv00090
Petitioner:
Curtis Lee Watson
Respondent:
United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Warren v. Bolster et al
as 1:2018cv00601
Petitioner:
Morris J Warren
Respondent:
Mark Bolster, J. Ray Ormond and United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
FEIST v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
as 2:2018cv00156
Petitioner:
DAVID FEIST
Respondent:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
HUGHES v. BOLSTER et al
as 2:2018cv00159
Petitioner:
JOHN HUGHES, III
Respondent:
J. Ray Ormond and United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
WARREN v. BOLSTER et al
as 1:2018cv00446
Petitioner:
MORRIS J. WARREN
Defendant:
MARK BOLSTER, J. RAY ORMOND and UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MILLER v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
as 1:2018cv00293
Petitioner:
JULIUS D. MILLER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HUGHES v. BOLSTER et al
as 1:2018cv00357
Plaintiff:
JOHN HUGHES, III
Defendant:
MARK BOLSTER, J. RAY ORMOND and UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
WILLIAMS v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2018cv00008
Petitioner:
JAMES C. WILLIAMS
Respondent:
United States Parole Commission and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
