Cases 41 - 50 of 10,239
Erik Becerra v. United States
as 24-1744
Petitioner:
Erik Becerra
Respondent:
United States of America
Thompson v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00557
Petitioner:
Dewayne Antwon Thompson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Younglove v. United States Of America
as 0:2024cv60941
Plaintiff:
Louis Charles Younglove
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Pyatt v. United States Of America
as 1:2024cv22096
Petitioner:
Joe Nathan Pyatt
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Foster v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00490
Petitioner:
Javon Santrell Foster
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Spalding v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00337
Petitioner:
David L Spalding
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Carrera-Chavez v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00310
Plaintiff:
Pedro Carrera-Chavez
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Aragones v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2024cv00148
Petitioner:
Nelson Aragones
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Barrientos v. Watts et al
as 5:2024cv00100
Petitioner:
Jose Barrientos
Respondent:
Watts and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Priscilla Ellis v. USA, et al
as 24-11729
Petitioner:
PRISCILLA ANN ELLIS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and WARDEN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
