Cases 81 - 90 of 220
MCCARY v. CLARK
as 2:2021cv00340
Petitioner:
MICHAEL LA SHAWN MCCARY
Respondent:
CCPM MICHAEL R. CLARK
Defendant:
JOSH SHAPIRO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WALKER v. TICE et al
as 2:2021cv01172
Petitioner:
KHALIL WALKER
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, JOSH SHAPIRO, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LARRY KRASNER and SUPERINTENDENT TICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HAYMES v. GARMAN et al
as 2:2021cv01022
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA JOSH SHAPIRO and MARK GARMAN
Petitioner:
LAMAR HAYMES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WHALEY v. BYRNE et al
as 2:2021cv00394
Petitioner:
ANTHONY WHALEY
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF STATE PENNSYLVANIA: JOSH SHAPIRO and DAVID BYRNE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CLARK v. CLARK et al
as 2:2021cv00061
Respondent:
EUGENE A. VITTONE, II, JOSH SHAPIRO and MICHAEL CLARK
Petitioner:
MELVIN R. CLARK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FLICK v. MASON et al
as 3:2020cv00252
Respondent:
WILLIAM SHAW, ATTORNEY GENERAL JOSH SHAPIRO and BERNADETTE MASON
Petitioner:
THOMAS EDWARD FLICK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BEY v. MCCUTCHEON et al
as 2:2020cv06236
Petitioner:
KOKAYI BARUTI ALI BEY
Respondent:
EDNA MCCUTCHEON, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LARRY KRASNER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF JOSH SHAPIRO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McCabe v. Mason et al
as 1:2020cv02278
Respondent:
Brenda Mason, Josh Shapiro, Pennsylvania Attorney General Office and others
Petitioner:
James Irwin McCabe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GUERRIOS v. GARMAN et al
as 2:2020cv05766
Respondent:
MARK C. GARMAN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY JOSH SHAPIRO
Petitioner:
JOSE GUERRIOS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Miller v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2020cv02129
Respondent:
John Wetzel, Josh Shapiro and PA State Attorney General
Petitioner:
Michael Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
