General Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 6,008
Settles v. Hudson
as 4:2024cv00258
Petitioner: Andrew Settles
Respondent: B Hudson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Gomez v. Andes
as 3:2024cv03032
Petitioner: John B. Gomez
Respondent: Warden Chance Andes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tyler v. Kelly
as 5:2024hc02097
Petitioner: Branden Tyler
Respondent: Lynne B. Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Horsey v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Pennsylvania Parole Board et al
as 4:2024cv00825
Petitioner: Donnelle Horsey
Respondent: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Pennsylvania Parole Board, B. Mason, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections d/b/a State Correctional Institution-Mahanoy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Branigh v. Richardson
as 1:2024cv00247
Plaintiff: Leotis B Branigh, III
Defendant: Warden Tim Richardson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Canty v. Lammer
as 1:2024cv04028
Petitioner: Anthony Canty
Respondent: B. Lammer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
OLUWADAMILARE v. WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv06201
Petitioner: ADELKE B. OLUWADAMILARE
Respondent: WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Terrence Jefferson v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 24-10829
Petitioner: TERRENCE B. JEFFERSON
Respondent: FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Canty v. Lammer
as 4:2024cv04091
Petitioner: Anthony Canty
Respondent: B Lammer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Adam Flores v. USA
as 24-1838
Petitioner: ADAM B. FLORES
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?