Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Alberty v. Rankins
as 4:2023cv00312
Petitioner:
Farron Whitney Alberty
Respondent:
United States of America, William Rankins and Chris Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Muse v. Entzel
as 3:2019cv00093
Petitioner:
Albertis L. Muse
Respondent:
Frederick Entzel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Albertie-Chamberlain v. Thomas et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2017cv00717
Plaintiff:
Nkosi Zuriel Albertie-Chamberlain
Defendant:
State of Alabama and Russell Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Albertie-Chamberlain v. Thomas et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2017cv00664
Plaintiff:
Nkosi Zuriel Albertie-Chamberlain
Defendant:
State of Alabama and Russell Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
E.T., a minor v. Alberti et al
as 3:2016cv01212
Petitioner:
E.T., a minor
Respondent:
Sue Alberti , Shannon Wisniewski , Matthew M Osterberg and others
Miscellaneous_party:
Sarah Ann Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Buess et al v. Scafide et al
as 3:2015cv00017
Plaintiff:
David Buess, Winona Mae Palmiotti and Winona Rosa Piscitelli
Defendant:
Lisa Scafide, Breann Kindinger, John Spon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Buess et al v. Scafide et al
as 1:2014cv07529
Defendant:
Frank Alberti, Judge Jerry Ault, Gregory J. Blass and others
Plaintiff:
David Buess, Winona Mae Palmiotti and Winona Rosa Piscitelli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jordan v. Lamanna et al
as 5:2007cv00371
Petitioner:
James Albertis Jordan
Respondent:
John J. Lamanna and Thurbert E. Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Albertie v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2007cv00144
Petitioner:
Robert Albertie
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
