Cases 1 - 10 of 5,990
Carrea v. State of California et al
as 3:2024cv00982
Petitioner:
Christopher Carrea
Respondent:
State of California, County of San Diego and San Diego County Public Defenders
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mosquera v. Rivers
as 4:2024cv00495
Petitioner:
Jose Adelmo Mosquera
Respondent:
Warden Christopher Rivers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Mosquera v. Rivers
as 1:2024cv22048
Petitioner:
Jose Adelmo Mosquera
Defendant:
Warden Christopher Rivers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Sanders v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00653
Petitioner:
Quordalis V Sanders
Respondent:
Wisconsin Department of Corrections and Christopher Nurse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Reeder v. Breitenbach et al
as 3:2024cv00220
Petitioner:
Christopher Scott Reeder
Respondent:
Nathanjah Breitenbach, State of Nevada and Nevada State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Christopher Peyton v. Daniel Akers
as 24-5505
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER PEYTON
Respondent:
DANIEL AKERS, Warden
Wrice v. Thomas
as 1:2024cv02261
Petitioner:
Christopher John Wrice
Respondent:
Micheal Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Douglas v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Marion)
as 5:2024cv00261
Petitioner:
Christopher Jason Douglas
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lindsey #333281 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv01150
Petitioner:
Jason Christopher Lindsey, Jr.
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
