Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Jackson v. California Board of Parole Hearings
as 2:2015cv00609
Petitioner:
Johnny Clifford Jackson
Respondent:
California Board of Parole Hearings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Clifford Fairfax v. William Stephens, Director
as 14-20639
Petitioner - Appellant:
CLIFFORD JACKSON FAIRFAX
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Clifford Jackson v. Carolyn Cross, et al
as 13-5229
Petitioner - Appellant:
Clifford Jackson
Respondent - Appellee:
Carolyn Cross, Warden, D.C. Jail and United States Parole Commission
Jackson v. Tripp et al
as 5:2013hc02136
Petitioner:
Clifford Jackson
Respondent:
Brick Tripp and United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
JACKSON v. CROSS et al
as 1:2012cv01414
Petitioner:
CLIFFORD JACKSON
Respondent:
CAROLYN A. CROSS and U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jackson v. Swarthout
as 2:2010cv02341
Petitioner:
Johnny Clifford Jackson
Respondent:
G. Swarthout
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Clifford Fairfax v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 10-40695
Petitioner - Appellant:
CLIFFORD JACKSON FAIRFAX
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Fairfax v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2010cv00137
Petitioner:
Clifford Jackson Fairfax
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jackson v. Swarthout
as 2:2010cv00504
Petitioner:
Johnny Clifford Jackson
Respondent:
G. Swarthout
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Swarthout
as 2:2010cv00494
Petitioner:
Johnny Clifford Jackson
Respondent:
G. Swarthout
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
