Cases 1 - 10 of 10
CORNISH V. BRITTAIN, ETAL
as 2:2023cv00380
Petitioner:
JOHN CORNISH
Respondent:
KATHY BRITTAIN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CORNISH v. UNDERWOOD
as 3:2022cv00122
Petitioner:
KOREY KASCHIEF CORNISH
Respondent:
WARDEN M. UNDERWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cornish v. Armal et al
as 1:2022cv00451
Petitioner:
Jonathan Cornish
Respondent:
Eric Armal and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cornish v. Federal Correctional Institution - Butner Medium I
as 5:2021hc02208
Petitioner:
Jonathan Ryan Cornish
Respondent:
Federal Correctional Institution - Butner Medium I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Bean Alan Cornish v. P.D. Brazelton
as 5:2013cv01302
Respondent:
P D Brazelton
Petitioner:
Bean Alan Cornish
William Cornish v. Donald Vaughn, et al
as 13-2291
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM CORNISH
Defendant - Appellee:
DONALD VAUGHN, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
Cornish v. Attorney General of the State of California
as 2:2012cv02460
Petitioner:
Jesse Cornish
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cornish v. MacDonald
as 2:2012cv01296
Petitioner:
Ammiel Cornish
Respondent:
Jim MacDonald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CORNISH v. COLEMAN et al
as 2:2010cv02841
Petitioner:
CHARLES MILT CORNISH
Respondent:
BRIAN V. COLEMAN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CORNISH v. ROZUM et al
as 2:2008cv05672
Petitioner:
JONATHAN MONTE CORNISH
Respondent:
GERALD ROZUM, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BERKS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
