General Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,082
Curry v. Colbert
as 3:2024cv00337
Plaintiff: Hakeem Curry
Defendant: D. Colbert
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Estella Curry v. Warden
as 24-11128
Curry v. Kirkland Corr. Ins/ State of South Carolina
as 0:2024cv01674
Petitioner: Jerome Curry and (Flesh And Blood Man)
Respondent: Kirkland Corr. Ins/ South Carolina, State of and Warden, Kirkland Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Curry v. Warden
as 2:2024cv00956
Petitioner: David Henry Curry
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Curry v. Wingfield
as 3:2024cv00141
Plaintiff: Freddie Lee Curry
Defendant: B. Wingfield, Federal Bureau of Prisons and United States Attorney General
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Curry v. Warden Carlton
as 8:2024cv00528
Petitioner: Jeriton Lavar Curry
Respondent: Warden Carlton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Curry v. Akers
as 6:2024cv00021
Petitioner: Robert Curry
Respondent: Daniel Akers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Curry v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2023cv01305
Petitioner: Ronald Curry
Defendant: State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Curry v. Monti et al
as 1:2023cv16541
Petitioner: Michael Curry
Respondent: Daniel Monti
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
John Curry v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-13486
Petitioner / Appellant: JOHN CURRY
Respondent / Appellee: SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?