Cases 1 - 10 of 171
SERNA v. EMERSON et al
as 1:2024cv01616
Respondent:
ODELL, IYC, DONALD EMERSON and others
Petitioner:
RONALD SERNA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Daniel Emerson Norton v. Israel Jacquez
as 5:2024cv01852
Petitioner:
Daniel Emerson Norton
Defendant:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Abdikarim v. Jahner et al
as 3:2024cv00162
Respondent:
Sheriff Jesse Jahner, Paul Emerson, Kimberlee Hegvik and others
Petitioner:
Zakariya Abdikarim
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BURGET v. EMERSON et al
as 1:2024cv01252
Respondent:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and DONALD EMERSON
Petitioner:
JOSEPH BURGET
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Emerson-Bey v. Arnold et al
as 1:2024cv02111
Respondent:
Maryland Attorney General and Keith K. Arnold
Petitioner:
Carl Emerson-Bey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HARRIS v. EMERSON
as 1:2024cv01202
Respondent:
DONALD EMERSON
Petitioner:
JOHN HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GOLDEN v. EMERSON
as 1:2024cv01144
Respondent:
DONALD EMERSON
Petitioner:
DEJUAN O. GOLDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tohafjian v. King
as 1:2024cv00643
Respondent:
M. J. King
Petitioner:
Emerson Tohafjian
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Daniel Emerson Norton v. J. Doerer
as 5:2024cv01370
Petitioner:
Daniel Emerson Norton
Respondent:
Warden J. Doerer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
WILSON v. EMERSON
as 1:2024cv01116
Respondent:
DONALD S. EMERSON
Petitioner:
JAMES GENE WILSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
