Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Hooker v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 5:2023cv00311
Petitioner:
Clarence Lee Hooker
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hooker v. California Men's Colony et al
as 3:2023cv01229
Petitioner:
Maurice W. Hooker
Respondent:
California Men's Colony and Administration and J. Gastelo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hooker v. Lumpkin
as 21-11222
Petitioner / Appellant:
Clarence Lee Hooker
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
HOOKER v. WARDEN
as 1:2022cv00409
Petitioner:
DAVID HOOKER
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hooker v. The People of the State of California
as 3:2021cv04228
Respondent:
The People of the State of California
Petitioner:
Maurice William Hooker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hooker v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2021cv00188
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Kendrick Hooker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hooker v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al (Pinellas County)
as 8:2020cv00549
Respondent:
Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Artez Hooker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hooker v. Harry et al
as 1:2019cv01352
Respondent:
Kenneth A Mummah, Emily Mezzner, Laurel Harry and others
Petitioner:
George J Hooker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hooker v. Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 5:2019cv00019
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Clarence Lee Hooker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hooker v. Davis
as 4:2019cv00283
Respondent:
Warden Rocky Moore and Lorie Davis
Petitioner:
Clarence Lee Hooker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
