Cases 1 - 10 of 250
Charles Lawson v. Warden Cumberland County Jail
as 24-1316
Plaintiff:
CHARLES A. LAWSON
Defendant:
WARDEN HUDSON COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and WARDEN CUMBERLAND COUNTY PRISON
Lawson v. Warden FCC Coleman
as 5:2023cv00723
Petitioner:
Willie Lawson
Respondent:
Warden FCC Coleman and Warden FCC Coleman - USP II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lawson v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 7:2023cv00788
Petitioner:
Michael D. Lawson
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rankin v. Landers
as 6:2023cv01477
Petitioner:
Lawson Reed Rankin
Respondent:
Sheriff Landers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lawson v. Warden of USP Lee
as 7:2023cv00373
Petitioner:
Leshawn Lawson
Respondent:
Warden of USP Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Christopher Martin v. Tom Lawson, et al
as 23-15835
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER MARTIN
Respondent / Appellee:
TOM LAWSON, Chief, Nevada Division Parole and Probation, STATE OF NEVADA and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Lawson v. Hendricks
as 6:2023cv00598
Petitioner:
Mark Elwyn Lawson
Respondent:
Kimberly Hendricks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Little v. Ray et al
as 5:2023cv00035
Petitioner:
Jerlaine Little
Respondent:
Warden Ray, Case Manager Lawson and Unit Manager Dzuback
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hughes v. Lawson
as 2:2023cv00015
Petitioner:
Martin Ellison Hughes
Respondent:
Russell Washburn and Ronnie Lawson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Steve v. Tuni et al
as 3:2023cv00025
Petitioner:
Lawson G Steve
Respondent:
Cathy Tuni, Six Tribal Council Members and Darin Balaam
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
