Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Ramirez v. Northeast New Mexico Detention Facility, et al
as 23-2195
Petitioner:
LUIS RAMON RAMIREZ
Respondent:
NORTHEAST NEW MEXICO DETENTION FACILITY, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
Ramirez-Lorenzo v. Escobar Pabon, et al
as 23-1279
Petitioner / Appellant:
LUIS A. RAMIREZ-LORENZO
Respondent / Appellee:
ANA I. ESCOBAR PABON, Secretary of Corrections and Rehabilitation and DOMINGO EMANUELLI HERNANDEZ, Attorney General
Ramirez v. United States
as 1:2021cv00979
Petitioner:
Luis Ramon Ramirez
Respondent:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ramirez v. Graft et al
as 1:2021cv00298
Respondent:
Bill Graft, Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office and Warden of York County Prison
Petitioner:
Luis Vicente Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ramirez-Lorenzo v. Rolon et al
as 3:2017cv01752
Plaintiff:
Luis A Ramirez-Lorenzo
Respondent:
Eric Y Rolon and Wanda I. Vazquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hernandez-Ramirez v. Attorney General of the State of Nevada
as 2:2015cv01280
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Petitioner:
Jose Luis Hernandez-Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ramirez v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II
as 5:2012cv00654
Petitioner:
Luis A. Ramirez
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Luis Ramirez v. Greg Grams, et al
as 08-2415
Petitioner - Appellant:
LUIS A. RAMIREZ
Respondent - Appellee:
GREG GRAMS, Warden
Ramirez v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2008cv00006
Petitioner:
Luis R Ramirez
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ramirez v. Grams
as 2:2007cv00738
Petitioner:
Luis A Ramirez
Respondent:
Greg Grams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
