Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Phung v. Jennings et al
as 5:2023cv00253
Petitioner:
Chung Phung
Respondent:
David W. Jennings, Deputy Director Matthew T Albence, Chad F. Wolf and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Johnson v. Fayette County Detention Center et al
as 5:2020cv00446
Respondent:
Director Farmer, Matthew T. Albence and Fayette County Detention Center
Petitioner:
Joshua Ryan Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Amaya Martinez v. Hott et al
as 1:2020cv01289
Respondent:
CHAD WOLF, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Matthew T. Albence and others
Petitioner:
Fily Amaya Martinez
Mendez-Barocio v. Barr et al
as 4:2020cv06110
Respondent:
Erik Bonnar, Warden of Immigration Detention Facility, Matthew T. Albence and others
Petitioner:
Juan Mendez-Barocio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Asencio v. Crawford, et al.
as 1:2020cv00972
Respondent:
Thomas Homan, Kevin McAllen, Ford Hott and others
Petitioner:
Leonardo Asencio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ali v. Rolle et al
as 1:2020cv23421
Defendant:
Warden of Immigration Detention Facility, Chad Wolf, Luis M. Rolle and others
Plaintiff:
Sharmarke Abdikadir Ali
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
AVILA GUILARTE v. BARR et al
as 4:2020cv00401
Respondent:
WILLIAM BARR, JOHN KELLY and MATTHEW T ALBENCE
Petitioner:
EMILIANO RAMON AVILA GUILARTE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
LIZAMA GUTIERREZ v. Hott
as 1:2020cv00712
Petitioner:
RODRIGO LIZAMA GUTIERREZ, Enrique Palomares Reyes, Victor Quintanilla Gallegos and others
Respondent:
Russell Hott, Chad F Wolf, Matthew T Albence and others
Buzaishvili v. Albence et al
as 1:2020cv04602
Petitioner:
Zurab Buzaishvili
Respondent:
Matthew T. Albence, William P. Barr and Chad F. Wolf
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mohammed v. Warden, Folkston ICE Processing Center
as 5:2020cv00071
Respondent:
Thomas Giles, Chad Wolf, Ronald D. Vitiello and others
Petitioner:
Farid Mohammed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
