Cases 1 - 10 of 1,013
MORRIS v. DIXON et al
as 1:2024cv00159
Respondent:
SECRETARY RICKY DIXON and WARDEN SCOTT MIDDLEBROOKS
Petitioner:
KYNORRI AKEAL MORRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morris v. Garrett
as 2:2024cv00173
Defendant:
USA
Plaintiff:
Brandon M Morris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
(HC) Morris v. Sierra County Clerks Office et al
as 2:2024cv01905
Petitioner:
Bruce Wayne Morris
Respondent:
Megans Law List and Sierra County Clerks Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morris v. Payne
as 24-3107
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER P. MORRIS
Respondent:
KEVIN PAYNE, Commandant, United States Disciplinary Barracks
Jessica Morris v. Jeremy Howard
as 24-1645
Petitioner:
JESSICA L. MORRIS
Respondent:
JEREMY HOWARD, Warden
Morris v. Wyoming Attorney General et al
as 2:2024cv00120
Petitioner:
Terrill Kim Morris
Respondent:
State of Wyoming and Wyoming Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morris v. Coleman
as 2:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Monica Morris
Defendant:
Does and Tameka Coleman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
TYLER v. HOUSER et al
as 2:2024cv01096
Petitioner:
LANCE TYLER
Respondent:
MORRIS HOUSER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MICHELLE HENRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morris v. Bennett
as 1:2024cv02696
Plaintiff:
Howard Morris
Defendant:
Stacie Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Terrell v. Calhoun
as 3:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Morris Andre Terrell
Defendant:
Sheriff Unknown Calhoun
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
