Cases 1 - 10 of 56
McMillan v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2024cv00038
Petitioner:
Andrew McMillan
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McMillan v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Orange County)
as 6:2023cv01818
Petitioner:
Harley A. McMillan
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McMillan v. Warden Jusino @ FCI Dublin
as 5:2023cv04451
Petitioner:
Sharon McMillan and Sharon Kaye McMillan
Respondent:
Warden Jusino @ FCI Dublin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Qudre McMillan v. Superintendent Chester SCI, et al
as 23-2253
Plaintiff / Appellant:
QUDRE MCMILLAN
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT CHESTER SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY BUCKS COUNTY
McMillan v. Warden
as 6:2023cv00499
Plaintiff:
James McMillan
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McMillan v. Williams
as 1:2022cv00143
Petitioner:
Khanief McMillan
Respondent:
Bryan Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Qudre McMillan v. Superintendent Chester SCI, et al
as 22-2809
Plaintiff / Appellant:
QUDRE MCMILLAN
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT CHESTER SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY BUCKS COUNTY
MCMILLIAN v. EASON et al
as 2:2022cv00670
Petitioner:
QUDRE MCMILLAN
Respondent:
KENNETH EASON, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF BUCKS COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WILLIAMS v. MCMILLAN
as 4:2022cv00034
Petitioner:
CARA WILLIAMS
Respondent:
MiOSHA MCMILLAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WILLIAMS v. MCMILLAN
as 5:2022cv00053
Petitioner:
CARA WILLIAMS
Respondent:
MiOSHA MCMILLAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
