Cases 1 - 10 of 414
Murray v. Emig et al
as 1:2024cv00568
Petitioner:
William E. Murray
Respondent:
Brian Emig and Kathleen Jennings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Murray v. Allendale Correctional Institution
as 4:2024cv02823
Petitioner:
Bryan Murray
Respondent:
Allendale Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hall v. NYS DOCCS
as 1:2024cv00252
Petitioner:
Murray Hall, III
Respondent:
NYS DOCCS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hall v. NYS DOCCS
as 9:2024cv00062
Petitioner:
Murray Hall, III
Respondent:
NYS DOCCS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James M. Murray v. Brian Birkholz
as 2:2023cv09749
Petitioner:
James M. Murray
Respondent:
Brian Birkholz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Murray v. Lumpkin
as 23-50776
Petitioner / Appellant:
Allen John Murray
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Brown v. SCDC et al
as 9:2023cv03657
Petitioner:
Trey C. Brown
Respondent:
SCDC, Warden Nelson and Lieutenant Murray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Murray v. Douglas
as 2:2023cv11636
Petitioner:
Kirk Murray
Respondent:
People of the State of Michigan and Adam Douglas
Murray v. Lumpkin
as 23-50494
Petitioner / Appellant:
Allen John Murray
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Stephenson Smith v. Sheriff, DeKalb County Georgia, et al
as 23-11474
Petitioner / Appellant:
STEPHENSON LAMAR SMITH
Respondent / Appellee:
SHERIFF, DEKALB COUNTY GEORGIA, APD OFFICER A. MORELL, Zone #6, APD OFFICER MURRAY, #2604 and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
