General Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 273
Reese v. State of Connecticut
as 3:2024cv00801
Petitioner: Reginald J. Reese, Jr.
Respondent: State of Connecticut
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Reese v. Bauman
as 5:2024cv10914
Petitioner: Deontez Lamar Reese
Respondent: Catherine Bauman
REESE v. BOOHER et al
as 2:2024cv01192
Petitioner: DONTA REESE
Respondent: BRADLEY BOOHER, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clarence Reese v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 23-13255
Petitioner / Appellant: CLARENCE B. REESE
Respondent / Appellee: SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Wardlaw v. Shane Jackson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv04779
Petitioner: Gonzales Reese Wardlaw
Respondent: Shane Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
REESE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv04223
Petitioner: LAWRENCE W. REESE
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Darren Reese v. Jay Forshey
as 23-3494
Petitioner / Appellant: DARREN M. REESE
Respondent / Appellee: JAY FORSHEY, Warden
Reese v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 23-1747
Plaintiff / Appellant: CLARENCE B. REESE
Defendant / Appellee: FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Ricky D. Dixon, Secretary Florida Department of Corrections
David Nathaniel Reese v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 23-10295
Petitioner / Appellant: DAVID NATHANIEL REESE
Respondent / Appellee: SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Reese v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 3:2022cv01366
Petitioner: David Nathaniel Reese
Respondent: Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?