Cases 1 - 10 of 190
Lay v. Hooper
as 24-30350
Petitioner:
Richard B. Lay
Respondent:
Tim Hooper, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
Lay v. Hooper
as 23-30782
Petitioner / Appellant:
Richard B. Lay
Respondent / Appellee:
Tim Hooper, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
Richard Rapozo v. Attorney General for the State of Hawaii, et al
as 23-15769
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICHARD B. RAPOZO
Respondent / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF HAWAII, SHAWN WEAD, Director of Dept of Corrections and ANNE E. LOPEZ, Attorney General of the State of Hawaii
Rapozo v. Hawaii, State of
as 1:2023cv00188
Petitioner:
Richard B. Rapozo and Richard Ropozo and Richard Borges Rapozo
Respondent:
Attorney General Hawaii, State of, Warden Shawn Wead and Anne E. Lopez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rapozo v. Hawaii, State of
as 2:2023cv00261
Petitioner:
Richard B Rapozo and Richard Ropozo and Richard Borges Rapozo
Respondent:
Hawaii, State of, Shawn Wead and Anne E Lopez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shehadeh v. Ives et al
as 2:2022at00012
Petitioner:
Jamal Shehadeh
Respondent:
Richard B. Ives and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Shortell v. Bunn
as 9:2020cv00890
Petitioner:
Richard B. Shortell
Respondent:
S. Bunn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shortell v. Kickbush
as 9:2020cv00062
Petitioner:
Richard B. Shortell
Respondent:
Susan Kickbush
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shortell v. Kickbush
as 6:2019cv06897
Petitioner:
Richard B. Shortell
Respondent:
Susan Kickbush
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Freeman v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction
as 2:2019cv04493
Petitioner:
Richard B Freeman
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
