Cases 1 - 10 of 2,316
Taylor #167396 v. Thornell et al
as 3:2024cv08171
Respondent:
Arizona, State of and Ryan Thornell
Petitioner:
Leon Robert Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Tirado v. Taylor
as 1:2024cv01069
Respondent:
Timothy Taylor
Petitioner:
Anthony Robert Tirado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
(HC) Tennigkeit v. Taylor
as 1:2024cv01057
Respondent:
Warden Taylor
Petitioner:
Tyler Maxwell Tennigkeit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
TAYLOR v. THOMPSON et al
as 1:2024cv08949
Respondent:
WARDEN R. THOMPSON and FCI FORT DIX
Petitioner:
MARSHALL TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
(HC) Garcia v. Warden Taylor
as 1:2024cv01044
Respondent:
Warden Taylor
Petitioner:
John Garcia, IV
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
(HC) Taylor v. Superior Court of California County of Sacramento
as 2:2024cv02271
Petitioner:
Robert A. Taylor
Respondent:
Superior Court of California County of Sacramento
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Taylor v. Covello et al
as 3:2024cv01446
Respondent:
Rob Bonta and Patrick Covello
Petitioner:
Keith Desmond Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TAYLOR v. RIVELLO et al
as 5:2024cv04009
Petitioner:
THOMAS DUANE TAYLOR
Respondent:
J. RIVELLO and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TAYLOR v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2024cv01289
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA
Petitioner:
AMANDA LEA TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TAYLOR v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2024cv01298
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA
Petitioner:
AMANDA LEA TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
