Cases 1 - 10 of 64
VERA v. PETERS et al
as 3:2023cv00271
Plaintiff:
LAZARO GINEBRA VERA
Respondent:
DIRECTOR BOP COLLETTE PETERS and WARDEN MICHAEL UNDERWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
VERA REINA v. WARDEN
as 1:2023cv04212
Petitioner:
DOUGLAS MIGUEL VERA REINA
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
(HC) Vera v. Reed
as 1:2023cv01057
Petitioner:
G Memo Vera
Respondent:
Melinda Reed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barriera-Vera v. Warden of Coleman-Low
as 5:2023cv00390
Petitioner:
Jose Barriera-Vera
Respondent:
Warden of Coleman-Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
(HC) Vera v. State of California
as 1:2023cv00884
Petitioner:
G. Memo Vera
Respondent:
State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vera v. 5114 Rollingstone Road
as 4:2023cv01812
Petitioner:
Martha Vera
Respondent:
5114 Rollingstone Road
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Guthrie-Nail v. Lozada
as 4:2023cv00027
Plaintiff:
Vera Elizabeth Guthrie-Nail
Defendant:
Andrea Lozada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Guthrie-Nail v. Lozada
as 3:2022cv02728
Petitioner:
Vera Elizabeth Guthrie-Nail
Respondent:
Andrea Lozada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vera v. USP Atlanta
as 3:2022cv00137
Petitioner:
Luis Vera
Respondent:
Stacey N. Stone and Warden USP Atlanta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
(HC)Vera Martinez v. Warden, FCI-Mendota
as 1:2022cv01282
Petitioner:
Jose J. Vera Martinez
Respondent:
Warden, FCI-Mendota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
