Cases 1 - 10 of 214
Vazquez-Diaz v. United States of America
as 6:2024cv03019
Petitioner:
Luis A Vazquez-Diaz
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
CASTILLO-VAZQUEZ v. WARDEN
as 1:2023cv23101
Petitioner:
JUAN CARLOS CASTILLO-VAZQUEZ
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Vazquez-Diaz v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv10639
Petitioner:
Luis A. Vazquez-Diaz
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
VAZQUEZ v. THOMPSON
as 1:2023cv22368
Petitioner:
JAIME VAZQUEZ
Respondent:
WARDEN THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
VAZQUEZ v. RIVELLO
as 2:2023cv02579
Petitioner:
JOSE VAZQUEZ
Respondent:
JOHN RIVELLO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Vazquez v. Jenkins
as 1:2023cv02694
Petitioner:
Ignatio Vazquez and Ignacio Vazquez
Respondent:
Warden Sylvester Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Pena-Vazquez v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 1:2023cv20483
Plaintiff:
Jorge L. Pena-Vazquez
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vazquez v. Miller
as 1:2023cv00564
Petitioner:
Juan P Vazquez
Respondent:
Supt Mark Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vazquez v. Wolfe
as 3:2022cv00205
Petitioner:
Edwin Vazquez
Respondent:
Warden R. Wolfe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
VAZQUEZ-VICENTE v. KNIGHT
as 1:2022cv06019
Petitioner:
JAYSON VAZQUEZ-VICENTE
Respondent:
WARDEN STEVIE KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
