Cases 1 - 10 of 303
Carroll v. Mississippi Dept. of Corr. Records Dept.
as 3:2024cv00184
Plaintiff:
Wiley Zachary Carroll
Defendant:
Mississippi Dept. of Corr. Records Dept.
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mitchell v. Lumpkin
as 24-40018
Petitioner:
Joshua Wiley Mitchell
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Napier v. Smith et al
as 1:2023cv01815
Plaintiff:
Jamy Napier
Defendant:
Tarvald Anthony Smith, Jeremy Wiley and Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Napier v. Smith et al
as 3:2023cv01692
Petitioner:
Jamy Napier
Respondent:
Tarvald Anthony Smith, Jeremy Wiley and Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jason Wesley Wiley v. Hestrin A. Michael et a
as 5:2023cv01463
Petitioner:
Jason Wesley Wiley
Respondent:
Hestrin A. Michael and Luis Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alexander Wiley v. Jon Noble
as 23-2324
Petitioner / Appellant:
ALEXANDER J. WILEY
Respondent / Appellee:
JON NOBLE
Wiley v. Lumpkin
as 3:2023cv00173
Petitioner:
Odis C. Wiley
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wiley v. Michael
as 4:2023cv00637
Petitioner:
Jason Wesley Wiley
Defendant:
Hestrin A. Michael
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davione Wiley v. Rick Hill
as 23-55035
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVIONE EUGENE WILEY
Respondent / Appellee:
RICK HILL, Acting Warden, Folsom State Prison
Jihae v. Gilley
as 6:2022cv00223
Petitioner:
Na'im Jihae and Dumonde Wiley
Respondent:
J. Gilley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
