Cases 11 - 20 of 41
Woods v. Stirling et al
as 5:2018cv00144
Petitioner:
Anthony Woods
Respondent:
Bryan P Stirling and Willie D Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stone v. Stirling et al
as 2:2017cv01221
Petitioner:
Bobby Wayne Stone
Respondent:
Bryan P Stirling and Joseph McFadden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Owens v. Stirling et al
as 0:2016cv02512
Petitioner:
Freddie Owens
Respondent:
Bryan P Stirling and Joseph McFadden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. Stirling et al
as 6:2016cv01655
Petitioner:
Charles Christopher Williams
Respondent:
Bryan P Stirling and Joseph McFadden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bryant v. Stirling et al
as 9:2016cv01423
Petitioner:
Stephen Corey Bryant
Respondent:
Bryan P Stirling and Joseph McFadden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnny Bennett v. Bryan Stirling
as 16-3
Petitioner - Appellee:
JOHNNY BENNETT
Respondent - Appellant:
BRYAN P. STIRLING, Commissioner, South Carolina Department of Corrections and JOSEPH MCFADDEN, Warden, Lieber Correctional Institution
Stokes v. Byars
as 1:2016cv00845
Petitioner:
Sammie Louis Stokes
Respondent:
Bryan P Stirling and Joseph McFadden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
In re: Angelo Fears, et al v. John Kasich, et al
as 16-3149
:
In re: OHIO EXECUTION PROTOCOL LITIGATION
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANGELO FEARS, RICHARD BAYS, ALVA E. CAMPBELL, JR. and others
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN KASICH, Governor, State of Ohio, GARY C. MOHR, Director, ODRC, DONALD MORGAN, Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility and others
Walker v. Renee Baker, et al
as 2:2015cv01240
Respondent:
Renee Baker and Adam Paul Laxalt
Unknown:
Adam P. Laxalt and Adam P. Laxalt
Appellant:
James Ray Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Andre Cole v. Donald Roper
as 15-1751
Petitioner - Appellee:
Andre Cole
Respondent - Appellant:
Donald P. Roper
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
