Cases 41 - 50 of 249
HANEY v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2016cv01901
Petitioner:
PATRICK RAY HANEY
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, ROBERT GILMORE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Fears, et al v. Donald Morgan, et al
as 16-4737
:
In re: OHIO EXECUTION PROTOCOL LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
ANGELO FEARS, et al
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GARY OTTE, RONALD PHILLIPS and RAYMOND TIBBETTS
Defendant - Appellant:
DONALD MORGAN, Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility, ANONYMOUS EXECUTION TEAM MEMBERS 1-50, c/o Southern Ohio Correctional Facility, CHARLES BRADLEY, Warden, Franklin Medical Center and others
Woodard v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2016cv02262
Petitioner:
Aric S. Woodard
Respondent:
John E. Wetzel, Robert Gilmore, Mark Garman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SMITH v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2016cv05791
Petitioner:
WAYNE SMITH
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, ROBERT GILMORE and MARK GARMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MURPHY v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2016cv01456
Petitioner:
KEVIN LEE MURPHY
Respondent:
JOHN WETZEL, ROBERT GILMORE, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HIGGS v. DANIELS
as 2:2016cv00321
Respondent:
CHARLES DANIELS
Petitioner:
DUSTIN JOHN HIGGS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
CASH v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2016cv04320
Petitioner:
OMAR SHARIFF CASH
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, ROBERT GILMORE and MARK GARMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
John King v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 16-70018
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN WILLIAM KING
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
John Conner v. Warden, GDCP
as 16-14962
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN WAYNE CONNER
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN
Battaglia v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2016cv01687
Petitioner:
John David Battaglia
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
