Cases 1 - 10 of 252
Rubio v. Lumpkin
as 24-70004
Petitioner:
John Allen Rubio
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Lindsay v. Raybon
as 4:2024cv00882
Respondent:
John Q. Hamm and Terry Raybon
Petitioner:
Stephon Lindsay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grayson v. Hamm et al(DEATH PENALTY)
as 2:2024cv00376
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Steven T. Marshall, Terry Raybon and others
Plaintiff:
Carey Dale Grayson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Travis v. Hamm
as 1:2024cv00206
Respondent:
John Q. Hamm
Petitioner:
Wayne Holleman Travis
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Death Penalty)
John Koehler v. Secretary Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-9000
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI, SUPERINTENDENT GREENE SCI and SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Plaintiff:
JOHN JOSEPH KOEHLER
Mills v. Hamm et al (DEATH PENALTY)
as 2:2024cv00253
Plaintiff:
Jamie Mills
Defendant:
John Hamm, Terry Raybon, Kay Ivey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Marshall et al (DEATH PENALTY)
as 2:2024cv00197
Plaintiff:
Alan Eugene Miller
Defendant:
Steve Marshall, Kay Ivey, John Q. Hamm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PEW v. HOSTERMON et al
as 2:2024cv00983
Plaintiff:
ALFONSO PERCY PEW
Defendant:
RAY HOSTERMON, PHILIP MATTIS, CHRISTOPHER MYERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wilson v. Hamm (DEATH PENALTY)
as 2:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
David P. Wilson
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Hamm et al (DEATH PENALTY)
as 2:2023cv00656
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Eugene Smith
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm and Terry Raybon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
