Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Piper v. Young et al
as 5:2020cv05074
Respondent:
Darin Young and The Attorney General of the State of South Dakota
Petitioner:
Briley Piper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CAMPBELL v. FLUKE et al
as 5:2018cv05077
Respondent:
Darin Young, Dennis Daugaard, Brent Fluke and others
Petitioner:
KELLY JOE CAMPBELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Christopher Young v. David Gutierrez, et al
as 18-70023
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER YOUNG
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID GUTIERREZ, JAMES LAFAVERS, BRIAN LONG and others
Charles Rhines v. Darin Young
as 16-3360
Petitioner - Appellant:
Charles Russell Rhines
Respondent - Appellee:
Darin Young, Warden, South Dakota State Penitentiary
Christopher Young v. William Stephens, Director
as 15-70023
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER YOUNG
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Clinton Young v. William Stephens, Director
as 14-70011
Petitioner - Appellant:
CLINTON LEE YOUNG
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Young v. Stephens
as 5:2013cv00500
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney and Stephen Hoffman
Respondent:
William Stephens
Petitioner:
Christopher Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Young v. Workman
as 07-5130
Petitioner - Appellant:
JULIUS RECARDO YOUNG
Respondent - Appellee:
MARTY SIRMONS, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary and RANDALL G. WORKMAN, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary
Young v. Quarterman
as 7:2007cv00002
Petitioner:
Clinton Lee Young and Clinton Lee Young
Respondent:
Nathaniel A. Quarterman and Nathaniel A. Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Rhines v. Weber
as 5:2000cv05020
Petitioner:
Charles Russell Rhines
Respondent:
Darin Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
