Cases 1 - 10 of 102
Eric Holmes v. Ron Neal
as 23-2890
Petitioner / Appellant:
ERIC D. HOLMES
Respondent / Appellee:
RON NEAL
Sievers v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Lee County)
as 2:2023cv00237
Petitioner:
Mark D. Sievers
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sievers v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Lee County)
as 3:2023cv00373
Petitioner:
Mark D. Sievers
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, STATE OF FLORIDA and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rodriguez v. Gittere et al
as 3:2023cv00031
Petitioner:
Pedro Rodriguez
Respondent:
Warden William Reubart, Aaron D. Ford and Warden William Gittere
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kevin Lisle v. William Reubart, et al
as 22-99009
Petitioner / Appellant:
KEVIN JAMES LISLE
Respondent / Appellee:
WILLIAM REUBART and AARON D. FORD
Richardson v. Gittere et al
as 3:2022cv00017
Petitioner:
Thomas Richardson
Respondent:
Warden William Gittere and Aaron D. Ford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Keck v. Gittere et al
as 3:2022cv00031
Petitioner:
William Keck
Respondent:
Warden William Gittere and Aaron D. Ford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Haugen v. Cain
as 2:2021cv00969
Petitioner:
Gary D. Haugen
Respondent:
Brad Cain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Witter v. Gittere et al
as 3:2020cv00345
Respondent:
Attorney General Aaron D. Ford and Warden William Gittere
Petitioner:
William Witter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Reeves v. Dunn et al (DEATH PENALTY)
as 2:2020cv00027
Defendant:
Cynthia D. Stewart and Jefferson S. Dunn
Plaintiff:
Matthew Reeves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
