Cases 91 - 100 of 434
Aspaas v. New Mexico Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2020cv01109
Defendant:
FNU Fike, George Zoley, New Mexico Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Judge Aspaas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TORRES v. GEO GROUP INC et al
as 5:2020cv00287
Defendant:
GEO GROUP INC, REEDER, DREW and others
Plaintiff:
DANNY TORRES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parker v. GEO Group Inc et al
as 1:2020cv00427
Defendant:
FNU Anderson, B Connelly, FNU Moore and others
Plaintiff:
Reginald I Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Foshee v. Bay Correctional & Rehab Facility et al
as 1:2020cv00426
Defendant:
FNU Cannelli, Bay Correctional & Rehab Facility, FNU Briscoe and others
Plaintiff:
Floyd Foshee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sedillo v. New Mexico Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2020cv01019
Plaintiff:
Adrian Sedillo
Defendant:
George C. Zoley, New Mexico Department of Corrections, The GEO Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Boutte' v. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2020cv00328
Defendant:
Aramark, Miami Correctional Facility, Judges and others
Plaintiff:
Lance Scott Boutte'
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nel v. Cole et al
as 4:2020cv00067
Defendant:
FNU Portillo, B. Collins, FNU Madrill and others
Plaintiff:
Jan Abraham Nel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Foshee et al v. Bay Correctional & Rehab Facility et al
as 1:2020cv00375
Plaintiff:
Ray Hill, Floyd Foshee and Reginald I Parker
Defendant:
FNU Cannelli, Bay Correctional & Rehab Facility, FNU Briscoe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Berkley v. Northam et al
as 3:2020cv00674
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Christy Jones, A. David Robinson and others
Plaintiff:
Issac Berkley, III and Isaac Berkley, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boughton v. Northan et al
as 1:2020cv00938
Plaintiff:
James R. Boughton, Jr. and Lord Serious Hakim Allah
Defendant:
Melissa Welch, Bernard Morris, Trey Fuller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
