Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Thompson #261144 v. Jaklevic et al
as 2:2017cv00068
Plaintiff:
Christopher Burnell Thompson #261144
Defendant:
Peter Jaklevic, Unknown Jaklevic, Scott P. Hill-Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
RAMIREZ v. HICKENLOOPER et al
as 1:2016cv01882
Plaintiff:
LUIS ALFONSO SOLARES RAMIREZ
Defendant:
JOHN HICKENLOOPER, RICK RAEMISH, TIANO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Dauphin County Adult Probation Office et al
as 3:2015cv00878
Plaintiff:
Warren D Anderson
Defendant:
Dauphin County Adult Probation Office, Dauphin County Sheriff's Department, Lower Paxton Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Houston v. Batiste et al
as 1:2015cv00633
Plaintiff:
Brent Burnell Houston
Defendant:
Batiste, Saucier, Dupre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clarence Burnell v. Office of Attorney General of
as 15-5027
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Clarence Rex Burnell
Defendant - Appellee:
Office of Attorney General of United States
BURNELL v. OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES
as 1:2014cv02206
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE REX BURNELL
Defendant:
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. Leblanc et al
as 2:2014cv03454
Plaintiff:
Burnell Leon Coleman
Defendant:
James LeBlanc, Cooley, Estes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. Leblanc et al
as 3:2014cv00706
Plaintiff:
Burnell Leon Coleman
Defendant:
Unknown Cooley, Angela Easton, Unknown Estes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cottier v. Blindman et al
as 4:2014cv04021
Plaintiff:
James A. Cottier
Defendant:
Burnell Blindman, Darol Young and Dennis Daugarrd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gibson v. Rosati
as 9:2013cv00503
Plaintiff:
Dana Gibson
Defendant:
C. Rosati, D. Maguire, P. McNally and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
