Cases 11 - 20 of 63
Lightfeather v. Credit Buarul Capitol One Credit Card et al
as 8:2022cv00236
Plaintiff:
Austin Edward Lightfeather
Defendant:
Credit Buarul Capitol One Credit Card, Vista Print Credit Pay Pal, Amazon Credit Card and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mickles v. Chase Credit Card et al
as 1:2021cv00479
Plaintiff:
Terrell Mickles
Defendant:
Chase Credit Card, Visa Credit Card, American Express and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freitas v. Derr et al
as 1:2020cv00312
Respondent:
Ms. Estella Derr, Mr. Kyle Olsen and Ms. Annelizabeth Card
Petitioner:
Mr. John Ferdinand Freitas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Sullivan v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2020cv00249
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Annelizabeth Card and Estela Derr
Plaintiff:
Leihinahina Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Marshall v. Cardeli
as 1:2019cv02080
Defendant:
Michael Cardeli
Plaintiff:
McKinley Marshall, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Nagel v. Warren et al
as 1:2019cv00113
Defendant:
Charles Tynon, Linda Ford, Company of Bruce Fyfe and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Nagel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Kobayashi et al
as 1:2018cv00336
Plaintiff:
Anthony Williams
Defendant:
Annelizabeth Card, Federal Detention Center - Honolulu, Kyle Olsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parks v. Direct Express Card Services
as 4:2018cv01385
Defendant:
Direct Express Card Services, John McClellan and Sprint International Corporation
Plaintiff:
Kyle Maurice Parks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Driscoll v. Chemung County
as 18-2361
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ramonn S. Driscoll
Defendant - Appellee:
Chemung County, Ryan Card, Sheriff Christopher Moss and others
Driscoll v. Chemung County et al
as 6:2017cv06752
Plaintiff:
Ramonn S. Driscoll
Defendant:
Chemung County, Ryan Card, Christopher Moss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
