Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Maxwell v. Suffolk County Corr. Facility Medical Department
as 2:2013cv01627
Plaintiff:
James Maxwell
Defendant:
Suffolk County Corr. Facility Medical Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maxwell v. Doe et al
as 1:2012cv08178
Plaintiff:
James Maxwell
Defendant:
John Doe, John Doe(s), Green Haven Correctional Facility Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maxwell v. Doe et al
as 9:2012cv01521
Plaintiff:
James Maxwell
Defendant:
John Doe, John Doe(s), Green Haven Correctional Facility Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Berestoff v. Multnomah County Health Dept. et al
as 6:2010cv00851
MCDC ID # 707872:
James Maxwell Worthin Berestoff
Defendant:
Corrections Health, Mental Health Section, Multnomah County Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Berestoff v. Multnomah County Sheriffs Office et al
as 6:2010cv00480
Plaintiff:
James Maxwell W. Berestoff
Defendant:
Multnomah County Sheriffs Office and Deputy Spencer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maxwell v. Linn County Correctional Center et al
as 1:2009cv00022
Plaintiff:
Curtis James Maxwell
Defendant:
Linn County Correctional Center, Unknown Booking Officer, Unknown Officer and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gibson v. Green et al
as 1:2008cv02146
Plaintiff:
James Maxwell Gibson
Defendant:
Kathleen Green, Dennis Johnson and Tony Parker
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Anders v. Webb et al
as 1:2008cv01074
Plaintiff:
Samuel Anders
Defendant:
Lynn Webb, Middleton, TN Police Dept and James Maxwell
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Maxwell v. Linn County Correctional Center
as 1:2007cv00018
Plaintiff:
Curtis James Maxwell
Defendant:
Linn County Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
