Cases 11 - 20 of 1,037
Weems v. Telfair State Prison et al
as 1:2024cv01235
Plaintiff:
Cetery Lamar Weems
Defendant:
Telfair State Prison and Ware State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Derrick Lamar Hairston v. M. Lopez et al
as 5:2024cv00601
Petitioner:
Derrick Lamar Hairston
Respondent:
M Lopez and G. Ephion
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Titus v Scarface et al
as 4:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus
Defendant:
Scarface, Al Pacino, Keef Coff Group and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Porter v. Icban et al
as 2:2024cv00696
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lamar Porter
Defendant:
T. Icban, D. Leyto, S. Shepherd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Calvin v. Carter et al
as 2:2024cv00297
Plaintiff:
Jamon Lamar Calvin and Jaman Aaron Swope
Defendant:
Olivia Carter, Christina Lewis and Wisconsin Department of Probation and Parole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hairston v. Lopez et al
as 3:2024cv00443
Plaintiff:
Derrick Lamar Hairston
Defendant:
M. Lopez and G. Ephion
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Jackson et al
as 1:2024cv00736
Plaintiff:
Stephenson Lamar Smith
Defendant:
Ted Jackson, Officer Jones and Officer Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODS v. COPELAND et al
as 4:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
LAMAR WOODS
Defendant:
ASHLEE COPELAND, W SUMMERS and MATTHEW J TERRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Paschall v. Johal, et al.
as 1:2024cv00154
Plaintiff:
Lamar Paschall
Defendant:
Amandeep Johal, Smith, Dr. Sinclair and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Wiseman et al
as 1:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Jason Lamar Lee
Defendant:
Shane L. Wiseman and Caruthersville Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
