Cases 11 - 20 of 77
Barr v. North Carolina Department of Public Safety et al
as 5:2020cv00031
Defendant:
CO-Staff at Caldwell Co Prison, Medical Staff at Caldwell Co Prison, Worker's Compensation Staff and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Allen Barr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Toombs v. Peoria Police Department et al
as 1:2020cv01083
Defendant:
Peoria Police Department, Paul Seagraves, Robert Thorne and others
Plaintiff:
JT Toombs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stanford v. Godbey
as 3:2020cv00115
Plaintiff:
Robert Allen Stanford
Defendant:
David C Godbey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Danenberg v. Crite et al
as 1:2019cv00146
Defendant:
Joy Johnson and SGT FNU Crite
Plaintiff:
Robert Allen Danenberg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Graves v. HARRIS COUNTY JAIL et al
as 4:2019cv01569
Plaintiff:
Robert Allen Graves
Respondent:
Harris County District Attorney Office and HARRIS COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Buttz v. Akin
as 4:2019cv00002
Plaintiff:
Robert Allen Buttz, Jr
Defendant:
N Lane Akin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pedigo v. Fulton County Jail
as 5:2017cv00199
Plaintiff:
Robert Allen Wayne Pedigo
Defendant:
Fulton County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parker v. Tucson Police Department et al
as 4:2017cv00551
Plaintiff:
Robert Allen Parker
Defendant:
Tucson Police Department, Lorence Jove and John Collins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pedigo v. Nursing Staff Southern Kentucky Health Partners et al
as 1:2017cv00160
Plaintiff:
Robert Allen Wayne Pedigo
Defendant:
Nursing Staff Southern Kentucky Health Partners and Jailer of Barren County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kennard Davis, et al v. James Walker, et al
as 17-16466
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNARD LEE DAVIS, guardian ad litem Ronnie Tolliver
Plaintiff:
RONNIE TOLLIVER, Guardian Ad Litem for Kennard Lee Davis
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES WALKER, Warden, SAMUEL MCALPINE, CHERYL BAKEWELL and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
