Cases 21 - 30 of 62
Erspamer v. Ward et al
as 5:2012cv00200
Plaintiff:
James Daniel Erspamer
Defendant:
Kelly J. Ward, D. D. Millsaps, J. Hayes and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Bruce Koklich v. James Yates, et al
as 11-17886
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRUCE KOKLICH
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES A. YATES, Warden, P. MENDOZA, Correctional Officer, CHAMNESS, Correctional Officer and others
Raymond Wright v. Ken Clark, et al
as 11-17548
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAYMOND WRIGHT
Defendant:
KEN CLARK, SCOTT KEBAN, J. WARD and others
Defendant - Appellee:
LEFLER, FIGUEROA, GONZALEZ and others
Koklich v. Yates et al
as 1:2011cv01507
Defendant:
James A. Yates, P. Mendoza, Chamness and others
Plaintiff:
Bruce Koklich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Koklich v. California Department of Corrections & Rebiliatation et al
as 1:2011cv01403
Plaintiff:
Bruce Koklich
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections & Rebiliatation , James A. Yates , P. Mendoza and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Koklich v. California Department of Corrections & Rebiliatation et al
as 1:2011at00503
Plaintiff:
Bruce Koklich
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections & Rebiliatation , James A. Yates , P. Mendoza and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Watson v. Ward et al
as 3:2011cv00351
Plaintiff:
Shepard Watson
Defendant:
J Ward and C Frayer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Williams, Sr. v. Richard Ward, Jr., et al
as 11-30547
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID LEE WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD J WARD, MARTIN K. MALEY, SR., MIKE CAZE, Sheriff and others
Manriquez v. Tilton, et al
as 1:2011cv00537
Plaintiff:
Daniel Manriquez
Defendant:
James Tilton, J. Woodford, Sue Hubbart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roper v. Does et al
as 4:2011cv00415
Plaintiff:
Roberto Roper
Defendant:
John Does, D. Brammer, R. Lepiane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
