Cases 21 - 30 of 105
Davis v. Ortiz et al Transferred to ND/TX, Lubbock Division
as 1:2016cv00176
Plaintiff:
James Davis
Defendant:
UP Ortiz, UP Reimer, Sharla Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Van Dyke v. Abernathy et al
as 1:2016cv00062
Plaintiff:
Dennis R. Van Dyke
Defendant:
Wayne Abernathy, Kent W. Brown, Clerk of Court Rutherford County, District, Superior and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. Pate et al
as 8:2016cv00709
Plaintiff:
Darian Antonio Coleman
Defendant:
John Pate , Charlie Frazier , Leon Mack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Van Dyke
as 1:2015cv00107
Plaintiff:
Dennis R. Van Dyke
Defendant:
Frank D. Whitney, Robert James Davis, 12 Jury Members and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
VAN DYKE v. DAVIS et al
as 1:2015cv00312
Plaintiff:
DENNIS VAN DYKE
Defendant:
THOMAS DAVIS, ROBERT JAMES DAVIS, PIEDMONT CORRECTIONAL CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Davis
as 1:2015cv00029
Plaintiff:
Ruben C Brooks
Defendant:
James Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 4:2014cv00283
Plaintiff:
ALBERT JAMES DAVIS
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Laberneuer et al
as 1:2014cv00835
Defendant:
Captain L. Brown, L. Glatt, Sergeant L. Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Rhondy James Davis, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Laberneuer et al
as 4:2014cv02101
Plaintiff:
Rhondy James Davis
Defendant:
E Laberneuer, L Brown, L Glatt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VAN DYKE v. DAVIS et al
as 1:2014cv00578
Plaintiff:
PROPHET PREACHER PRO SE WRITER ATTORNEY AT LAW DENNIS ROGER VAN DYKE
Defendant:
ROGER JAMES DAVIS, BRUSE BURGER, CHARLES VANCE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
