Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Tashami Sims v. John Kelly, et al
as 12-57137
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TASHAMI SIMS, AKA James King
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN KELLY, DAVID CHAVEZ, LUIS SANCHEZ and others
King v. Neven et al
as 2:2012cv00572
Defendant:
Scott Alexander, Maintenance Mike, Cole Morrow and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew James King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Tafari v. Gettman, et al.,
as 9:2011cv01446
Plaintiff:
InJah Tafari
Defendant:
Gary Gettman, James King, Jason Rushlaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. State of Missouri, Department of Corrections, Board of Probation and Parole et al
as 4:2009cv01131
Plaintiff:
Michael K. Anderson
Defendant:
State of Missouri, Department of Corrections, Board of Probation and Parole, Shelly Crump, Karen Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kevin Johnson v. Sue Rahr, et al
as 08-35405
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN GREGORY JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
SUE RAHR, King County Sheriff, UNNAMED DEPUTY SHERIFF 1, UNNAMED DEPUTY SHERRIFF 2 and others
ARROYO v. BARHAM et al
as 3:2007cv04195
Plaintiff:
DELIRIS V. ARROYO
Defendant:
WILLIAM BARHAM, COUNTY OF MONMOUTH, NEW JERSEY, MONMOUTH COUNTY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thaggard v. Shaw et al
as 5:2007ct03072
Plaintiff:
James Thaggard
Defendant:
R. Shaw, C/O Ellis, Sergeant Duda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thaggard v. Strickland et al
as 5:2007ct03064
Plaintiff:
James Thaggard
Defendant:
Lt. Strickland, Joseph Lightsey, Z. Simmons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steele v. Carr et al
as 5:2007ct03061
Plaintiff:
Trevon Steele
Defendant:
Sgt. Carr, R. Wellman, McCullough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
