Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Kay v. Hudson et al
as 5:2011cv00065
Plaintiff:
Dexter D Kay
Defendant:
David Hudson, Brad Livingston, J Calfee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas, III v. Tate et al
as 1:2011cv00060
Plaintiff:
Earl Thomas, III
Defendant:
Mary Kelly Tate, President of Uni. of Richmond, T.C. Williams School of Law and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. The Chairman of the Texas Board of Criminal Justice et al
as 6:2010cv00646
Plaintiff:
Dreaglen S Davis
Defendant:
The Chairman of the Texas Board of Criminal Justice, Susan Bauer, D Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. The Chairman of the Texas Board of Criminal Justice et al
as 4:2010cv03976
Plaintiff:
Dreaglen S Davis
Defendant:
The Chairman of the Texas Board of Criminal Justice, Susan Bauer, D Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Victor Fourstar, Jr. v. Murlak, et al
as 10-56006
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VICTOR CHARLES FOURSTAR, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
MURLAK, Institutional Counselor, ALDRICH, Institutional Case Manager, NORWOOD, Warden of Institution and others
Sean Phillips v. T.C. Scott
as 10-11537
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SEAN JEROME PHILLIPS
Defendant - Appellee:
T.C. SCOTT, Deputy, Douglas County, GA; sued in their personal and individual capacities
Berryhill v. Henry et al
as 6:2010cv00091
Plaintiff:
Lavern Berryhill
Defendant:
Brad Henry, Jari Askins, Drew Edmondson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VanDyke v. Sisto et al
as 2:2008cv03120
Plaintiff:
Bradly VanDyke
Defendant:
D.K. Sisto, T.C. Sequira, M. Fuizzotti and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Claiborne v. Kosher et al
as 2:2008cv01607
Plaintiff:
Dennis G. Claiborne
Defendant:
Kosher, - Conrad, Cornel and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Talley v. Bailey et al
as 2:2008cv00752
Plaintiff:
Jerome Talley
Defendant:
T.C. Bailey and Seattle Police Department
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
