Cases 31 - 40 of 521
(PC) Uhuru v. Cueva et al
as 2:2023cv01321
Plaintiff:
Diallo Earl Uhuru and Kohen Diallo E. Uhuru
Defendant:
Daniel E. Cueva, G Khaku, Mr. Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BALL v. MILLER et al
as 5:2023cv00234
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS LEROY BALL
Defendant:
JUDGE B JR MILLER, SHERIFF DAN KILGORE, LT HEATH EPPINGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heath v. Brouse et al DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE. Case has been electronically transferred to USDC ED/TX- Marshall Division.
as 2:2023cv00315
Plaintiff:
Secial Heath
Respondent:
Charolette Brouse and Mallory Brouse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heath v. Brouse et al
as 4:2023cv02352
Plaintiff:
Secial Heath
Defendant:
Charolette Brouse and Mallory Brouse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heath v. Brimingham et al DO NOT DOCKET Case electronically transferred to The Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division.
as 2:2023cv00275
Plaintiff:
Secial Heath
Respondent:
Rod Brimingham and Don Dawson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heath v. Brimingham et al
as 4:2023cv02128
Plaintiff:
Secial Heath
Defendant:
Rod Brimingham and Don Dawson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Mitchell et al
as 4:2023cv04060
Plaintiff:
Timothy Wade Jackson
Defendant:
Connie Mitchell, Public Defender Connor Herrold, Louis White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heath v. Harris County Jail
as 4:2023cv02045
Plaintiff:
Secial Heath
Defendant:
Harris County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heath v. Unknown Defendant
as 4:2023cv00557
Plaintiff:
Secial Heath
Defendant:
Unknown Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. Jackson
as 1:2023cv00202
Plaintiff:
Donal R. Edwards
Defendant:
Heath Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
