Cases 31 - 40 of 5,967
Bates v. Tidwell
as 24-10359
Plaintiff:
Kevin Kelly Joe Bates
Defendant:
Sergeant Jeremy Tidwell, Corporal Martin Rosas and Officer Davian Moore
Pena v. Gonzalez
as 24-20163
Plaintiff:
Martin Pena, Jr.
Defendant:
Ed Gonzalez, Sheriff of Harris County and Joshua Dillard, Jailer/ Public Servant
Keaton v. Martin
as 1:2024cv00138
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Keaton
Defendant:
Dennis Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel Kauwe v. Nicole Caceres et al
as 8:2024cv00855
Plaintiff:
Daniel Kauwe
Defendant:
Nicole Caceres, Stacey Berardino, Clayton Chau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keaton v. Martin
as 5:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Keaton
Defendant:
Dennis Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyd v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00700
Plaintiff:
Christopher L. Boyd
Defendant:
Semple, Arone, Cepelak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Christenson Copeland et al
as 2:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
Jerry A Smith and Jerry Antwon Smith
Defendant:
J Christenson Copeland, M Wala, Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Christenson Copeland et al
as 3:2024cv00306
Plaintiff:
Jerry A Smith and Jerry Antwon Smith
Defendant:
J Christenson Copeland, M Wala, Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riggs, Sr. v. Lumpkin et al.
as 7:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
James Tyrone Riggs, Sr
Defendant:
Director Bobby Lumpkin, Chairman David G. Gutierrez, Parole Boardmember Elodia Brito and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lucas v. Kelley et al
as 9:2024cv00502
Plaintiff:
London Lucas and London H. Lucas
Defendant:
Kelley, Dr. Macri, RN Napoli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
