Cases 31 - 40 of 47
Mendez v. FMC Minnesota et al
as 0:2016cv00845
Plaintiff:
Raphael Mendez
Defendant:
FMC Minnesota , Lt. Holbus , Officer Kepp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright, Jason v. Sauk County Sheriff Dept of Corrections et al
as 3:2016cv00119
Plaintiff:
Jason Lee Wright
Defendant:
Sauk County Sheriff Dept of Corrections, Sauk County Public Defenders Office, Sauk County Dept of Corrections Unit #811 Parole and Probation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Castelare v. Black et al
as 3:2015cv01124
Plaintiff:
Devaris Castelare
Defendant:
Black, Kim Jones, Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Trzeciak v. Padilla et al
as 2:2015cv00218
Petitioner:
Joseph Trzeciak, Sr
Defendant:
Nicholas J Padilla, Stewart, Kim Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Purtue v. Kearnes et al
as 1:2015cv00551
Plaintiff:
Michael Purtue
Defendant:
B. Kearnes, G. Eberle, S. Rizer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Collymore v. LaJoie et al
as 3:2014cv01260
Plaintiff:
Anthony T. Collymore
Defendant:
Michael LaJoie, Jon Brightaupt, James Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniels v. Reed et al
as 1:2013cv00416
Plaintiff:
Curtis Daniels
Defendant:
S. Reed, P. Matzen, T. Haak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tyrone Green v. Cynthia Sneath, et al
as 12-2157
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TYRONE GREEN
Defendant - Appellee:
CYNTHIA SNEATH, Det., HOLTZ, LAWLER, Supt. and others
Fred Carter v. Raymond Lawler, et al
as 11-2919
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRED CARTER
Defendant - Appellee:
RAYMOND LAWLER, Superintendent, SCI Huntingdon, CHARLES MITCHELL, Hearing Examiner,SCI Huntingdon, ROBERT MACINTYRE, Chief Hearing Examiner, SCI Camp Hill and others
Redmond v. Wilson et al
as 2:2011cv00012
Defendant:
Ron Wilson and Stephanie Eberle
Plaintiff:
Tim Kent Redmond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
