Cases 41 - 50 of 53
Wilks v. King County et al
as 2:2010cv00589
Plaintiff:
James Dean Wilks
Defendant:
King County, King County Jail Captains, King County Jail Sergeants and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. United States Court of Appealf for the Ninth Circuit
as 4:2009cv05999
Plaintiff:
James Dean Taylor
Defendant:
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Prosper et al
as 2:2008cv01081
Plaintiff:
James Dean Taylor
Defendant:
Kathy Prosper, Anglea, - Riley and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Davis v. Hunter et al
as 2:2008cv01052
Plaintiff:
Johnny Lee Davis
Defendant:
Ofc Hunter, John Clark, Ofc Farmer and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Wilks v. King County et al
as 2:2008cv00386
Plaintiff:
James Dean Wilks
Defendant:
King County, Vernette Stowers, A Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
James Van Wyhe v. Tim Reisch, et al
as 08-1409
Plaintiff - Appellee:
James Dean Van Wyhe
Defendant - Appellant:
Tim Reisch, Douglas Weber and Jennifer Wagner
Defendant:
H. Veld, CBM Food Services, Troy Ponto and others
Wilks v. Stowers et al
as 2:2007cv02084
Plaintiff:
James Dean Wilks
Defendant:
Vernette Stowers, T. Hansen, Woodbury and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilks v. King County et al
as 2:2007cv01720
Plaintiff:
James Dean Wilks
Defendant:
King County, Hansen, M Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilks v. O'Cleary et al
as 2:2007cv01504
Plaintiff:
James Dean Wilks
Defendant:
Officer O'Cleary, Officer Lang, Officer Fox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EAKER v. OVERTURF et al
as 1:2007cv00608
Plaintiff:
JAMES DEAN EAKER
Defendant:
OVERTURF, HATLEY, PRESLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
